keskiviikko 9. tammikuuta 2019


RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 


3 JANUARY 2019
ON JANUARY 3, 2019 

BY PATRICK ARMSTRONG IN RF SITREP


BALANCE. The first successful test of the Avangard hypersonic vehicle is announced. Super fast (Mach 27 they say) and highly manoeuvrable, development began when Washington withdrew from the ABM Treaty. 

Putin promised that Russia would “act independently”, it did and here we are today. Avangard nullifies the entire US ballistic missile defence effort: “We don’t have any defense“. Impossible to shoot down: there’s only about 20 minutes from launch to anywhere and it can be coming in from any direction. 

Putin, in his presser, said Avangard “maintains the balance”. It’s important to understand Moscow’s point of view and not respond with petulance

Because, here as elsewhere, Moscow has got it right: the danger of ballistic missile defence development is that one side might come to believe that its defence is good enough to save it from a response and might be tempted to do a first strike. (Who’s stupid enough? 

Well, that’s what all this stuff is about: removing the possibilities). The ABM Treaty preserved the crazy, but stable, balance of mutual assured destruction. It was stable because, each side knew that, whatever the start state, whatever happened in between, the end state would always be the same: destruction of both. 

But Washington, convinced it would be supreme forever, tossed the Treaty in 2001. Russia now has a weapon that cannot be stopped; therefore there is no possible way to stop a retaliatory strike and so no first strike is conceivable. We’re back to the crazy stability of mutual assured destruction. This is rebalancing. But it would have been much easier, cheaper and safer to have kept the original Treaty.

RUSSIA INC. From Putin’s presser. 2018 numbers so far. GDP up 1.7%, industrial output up 2.9%; fixed capital investment up 1.4%; real incomes showing small growth of 0.5%; expect to hit inflation estimate of 4%; unemployment down to just under 5%; trade surplus on track to be about $190 billion; gold and foreign currency reserves $464 billion. 

There will be a small budget surplus (first since 2011) and the National Welfare Fund has grown about 22%. Life expectancy up a bit to 72.9 years. The Energy Minister estimates Russia earned an extra $120 billion in two years of oil production cuts. Russia is surviving the West’s sanctions. Putin later added that Russia produces about 80% of “vital medications”.

PUTIN ON SOCIALISM. See this. Still a тупик (Russian slang for dead end). (EP. It is not a slang word, just normal literary expression. EP.)

THE COUNTRY THAT MAKES NOTHING 

The modernised Tu-22M3M has taken its first flight. 3 1/2 million cars have travelled the Crimea Bridge. (Winter bonus picture: Russia’s, and the world’s, second largest icebreaker at the North Pole).

RECIPROCITY? The FSB has arrested an American on espionage charges. It is possible that this is retaliation for the disgusting treatment of the wretched Maria Butina but if so, we may be sure that Moscow will be scrupulous in playing by the rules. If for no other reason than to make the point.

SYRIA. Predictable results from Trump’s withdrawal decision. Ankara holds back on its attack on the Kurds but continues threatening. Syrian Army took over a key town with Kurdish agreement. Moscow is the place to be: Kurds are there and so are Turks. The likely result will be Kurds and Damascus making an agreement that allows Damascus to control the territory and Ankara’s concerns taken into account. Recognising reality, Arab states re-establish relations with Damascus. The soldiers of Washington and its minions were the obstacle to peace. More to come apparently: Trump has ordered a big withdrawal from Afghanistan and that plans for full withdrawal be drawn up. Pat Buchanan sums up the complete failure of Washington’s wars in the MENA. Good analysis by Elijah Magnier.

SKRIPALMANIA. Putin: “Without the Skripal case, they would have come up with something else. This is quite obvious to me. Their only goal is to contain Russia and prevent it from emerging as a potential competitor.” Sochi toilets; MH17; doping; “invasion of Crimea”; election whatever-the-story-is-now; Masha and the Bear and on and on. Always something. (But I don’t think Russia is losing this, do you?)

AMERICA-HYSTERICA. This headline sums up the latest stage of nonsense: “Firm Who Warned America of ‘Russian Meddling’ Caught Running Fake Russia Bot Campaign. And yet the idiocy continues and can only get worse when this guy, who thinks Putin has a man follow Medvedev around threatening to smother him, is in charge of investigations. We’re finding out how stupid stupid can become. It would be funny if there was anything to laugh about taunting a nuclear superpower.

UKRAINE. Informative exchange between Putin and a Ukrainian reporter. To read it, search here for Roman Tsymbalyuk.







Patrick Armstrong Analysis, Canada Russia Observer


Why Don't Russians Smile?


Famous linguist reveals the reasons
Iosif Sternin (Adme.ru) Fri, May 15, 2015


This article originally appeared at Adme.ru It was translated by Sergey Turgenev

Foreigners regularly say that Russians are astonishingly unsmiling people. This fact is widely mentioned in the blogs, tour-guides, discussed in personal conversations and shared with friends and acquintances. Indeed, we Russians smile more rarely than other nationalities, but, as explained below, we have our own reasons for this.

Russen sind nicht wie Amerikaner, sie brauchen einen Grund zum Lächeln

Famous scientist, professor Iosif Sternin, names one of the specific parts of the Russian national character - everyday unsmiliness and explains it with several reasons. AdMe.ru quotes extracts from the article of the professor, which bring a light to some of the peculiarities of the mysterious Russian soul.

1. A smile in the Russian communication is not equal to politeness. Western smiles during greetings mean pure politeness. The more a person smiles, the more friendliness he or she wants to demonstrate to his partner. The constant polite smile are called by Russians as the - "duty smile" and is considered as a bad feature of a person, indicating his insincerity, secrecy, unwilingness to reveal his true emotions. The geniune Russian smile - is the sign of personal sympathy, but not politeness.

2. Russians do not smile to strangers. A smile in Russian communication is mainly adressed to acquintances. That is why the sales-assistances in Russia are not smiling to the customers - simply because they do not know them. If the customer is already known in the shop, the sales assistant will often smile.

3. It is not typical for Russians to smile back. If a Russian person sees someone he doesn't know smiling to him/her, he will, undoubtedly, try to guess a reason for this smile. He would probably think that it might be something in his clothes or haircut made that smiling fellow to have fun.

4. A Russian has to have a sufficient reason to smile, which will be obvious to the others. This gives a person the right to smile - from the point of view of the other people. Russian language contains an unique proverb, which is not presented in the other languages: "The laugh without reason - is the sign of stupidity" ("Smeh bez prichiny - priznak durachiny")

5. Unsmiliness of a Russian person (exact unsmiliness, but not gloominess - most Russians are cheerful, joyful and witty people) is supported by Russian folklore, where we find a mass of proverbs and sayings "against" laughter and jokes.

6. It is not common among Russians to smile during the execution of their professional duties or during the performance of any serious action whatsoever. For example the customs officials in the airports are never smiling as they are busy with serious business.

7. The true Russian smile exist only as a sincere smile, and is regarded as the sincere expression of the good mood or a favour to interlocutor.








PSYCHOANALYSING NATO: SCHIZOPHRENIA


ON DECEMBER 24, 2018 
BY PATRICK ARMSTRONG
IN NATO, PROPAGANDA, LIES AND NONSENSE, PUTIN DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, WAR ON RUSSIA

(First published at Strategic Culture Foundation; picked up by SouthFront)

NATO sorrowfully explains its problems with Russia on its official website:

For more than two decades, NATO has worked to build a partnership with Russia, developing dialogue and practical cooperation in areas of common interest. Cooperation has been suspended since 2014 in response to Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine but political and military channels of communication remain open. Concerns about Russia’s continued destabilising pattern of military activities and aggressive rhetoric go well beyond Ukraine.

None of this – of course – is NATO’s fault: on the contrary NATO is concerned that

Russia’s military activities, particularly along NATO’s borders, have increased and its behaviour continues to make the Euro-Atlantic security environment less stable and predictable, in particular its practice of calling snap exercises, deploying near NATO borders, conducting large-scale training and exercises and violating Allied airspace.

Suffice it to say that this statement would have a closer relationship with reality if the words “NATO’s borders” were replaced with “inside Russia”. And I would be interested to hear the details of “violating Allied airspace”. Why even the Daily Telegraph in 2015 with its suggestive headline of Mapped: Just how many incursions into Nato airspace has Russian military made? had to admit “The Ministry of Defence says the Russian bombers have never violated Britain’s sovereign airspace, which extends 12 nautical miles from the coast.” Likewise Violated US Airspace 16 Times In Last 10 Days turns out to be Air Defence Identification Zones which is not the same thing at all. Or Most Russian Plane Intercepts over Baltics Due to Error: NATO General. So NATO’s statement needs a further calibration so that “violating Allied airspace” becomes “flying in international airspace close to Allied countries’ airspace”.


Therefore, properly understood, NATO accuses Russia of 1) holding military exercises in its own territory, 2) flying in international airspace, 3) supporting secessionist movements in places that weren’t part of Yugoslavia or aren’t in the Middle East or North Africa. And they accuse it of invading countries that NATO didn’t invade first. NATO projects its behaviour, gaslights its audienceand confirms its initial assumption when Moscow objects. But that’s NATOLand for you – the unicorns roam free and all is sunny until the bear smiles.


There is a striking schizophrenia among NATO’s members: Russia is, at one and the same time, so weak it’s “doomed” and so strong that it’s demolishing NATOLand.


Russia is forever, eternally, endlessly, doomed. Always on the edge of collapse. (But Russia has always been doomed here’s Time in 1927) and it was altogether finished in 2001. But doom dooms on. Has an ‘open society’ doomed Russia to fail? (September 2012); Russia Is Doomed (March 2014); Why Putin’s Adventure in Ukraine Is Doomed (April 2014); Putin’s Nationalism and Expansion Strategy Is Doomed to Fail (September 2014); Sorry, Putin. Russia’s economy is doomed (December 2014); Remember Russia? It’s still doomed(January 2015); Morgan Stanley thinks Russia’s doomed (February 2015); Secretary of Defense: Russia ‘Doomed to Fail’ in Syria (September 2015); Is Russia’s Economy Doomed to Collapse? (July 2016); Why The Saudi-Russian Oil Agreement Is Doomed To Fail (September 2016); Putin’s Bridge to Crimea Is Doomed to Collapse (January 2017); Russia’s Su-57 Stealth Fighter Is Doomed to Fail (December 2107); The Russian economy looks doomed (March 2018); Russia is doomed to steadily fall behind the rest of the world (August 2018); Why Putin’s 5-100 project is doomed to fail (October 2018). And its soccer team too! Aging and Inexperienced: Why Russia Is Doomed to Fail (June 2018).


You’d think, with all this doom dooming away at Russia, that no one would be much worried about it. Except of course for the risk of getting bits of it spattered on you when it finally crashes down. Said collapse confidently predicted three years ago by Alexander Motyl, who, making his wish the father of his thought, declaimed that Russia might even “disappear”:


As the new year begins, both Ukraine and Russia are making steady progress. The difference is that, while Ukraine is slowly, and more or less surely, adopting a raft of systemic reforms that will make it a normal Western market democracy, Russia is becoming a failed state. If current trends continue, as they probably will, Russia may even disappear.


But, amazingly, Russia has become more powerful than ever before. Not even Stalin in his wildest dreams imagined choosing the next US President. Yet, even as “weak and dying” Russia freefalls, Putin has done exactly that: “Vladimir Putin has a plan for destroying the West—and that plan looks a lot like Donald Trump” Trump being what Putin would design to “undermine American interests – and advance his own”. “Trump is Putin’s ally in Russia’s war on the West”. But even before he animated his Trumpenpuppet, his tendrils had slithered deep into Washington: “Putin’s Got America Right Where He Wants It: And that’s bad news for Obama”. So Putin, although he’s no genius, just another Brezhnev, has a puppet in the White House.


But not just there: Putin (Aspergers, “gunslingers’ walk”, lonely psychopath that he is), through his “useful idiots“, affects everything, everywhere. Brexit. French election. Italian election. German election. Austrian election. Dutch election. Canada’s next election. Catalonian separatism. Gilets jaunes. Hungary’s Prime Minister is a Putinist. And it’s more, so much more: Russia and the Threat to Liberal Democracy: How Vladimir Putin is making the world safe for autocracy. Moscow’s unstoppable “Hybrid War” weaponising Information, Culture and Money. Separatism, migrants, left wing right wing.


Sounds as if we’re the ones who are doomed.


In this race of the doomed: who will get to the FINAL DOOM first?




tiistai 8. tammikuuta 2019

A BRUTAL FRIENDSHIP: UKRAINE AND THE IMF / ЖЕСТОКАЯ ДРУЖБА: УКРАИНА И МВФ



RUSSIA INSIDER
2015
Alexander Mercouris/Александр Меркурис
Перевод на русский Е. Пююхтиа

A Brutal Friendship: Ukraine and the IMF
Germany, Stuck with Massive Bill for Ukraine, Asks Russia for Help


IMF: Ukraine Weeks Away from Economic Collapse - $15 billion urgently needed

With 1 hand EU asks Russia for financial help, with other it bombs ethnic Russians in East Ukraine, sanctions Russian economy...


Брутальная дружба: Украина и МВФ
Германия, увязшая с огромным счетом за Украину, просит Россию помочь

МВФ: Украина находится в нескольких неделях от экономического коллапса - срочно требуются 15 млрд долларов

With 1 hand EU asks Russia for financial help, with other it bombs ethnic Russians in East Ukraine, sanctions Russian economy... 

Одной рукой ЕС просит Россию о финансовой помощи, а второй бомбит этнических русских на Востоке Украины и подвергает санкциям российскую экономику...

Black hole of Ukraine finances becoming a political liability for EU leaders
Черная дыра украинских финансов становится политически уязвимым местом для лидеров ЕС

EU demanding austerity from Ukraine while population struggles with grinding poverty, economic collapse

ЕС требует режима жесткой экономии от Украины, в то время, как ее население борется за выживание в жерновах нищеты и экономического коллапса 

EU policy towards Russia/Ukraine poorly conceived, in danger of collapsing due to contradictions

Плохо спланированная политика ЕС по отношению к России/Украине на грани коллапса в силу ее противоречий

Alexander Mercouris  OPINION Thu, Dec 11 | 


Александр Меркурис

A Brutal Friendship: Ukraine and the IMF

As this article in the Financial Timesshows, the wheels are coming off Ukraine’s economy, with the IMF now admitting it needs a further $15 billion on top of the money already given within weeks to avoid total collapse.
Жестокая Дружба: Украина и МВФ

Как показывается в этой статье издания "Файнэншиал Таймз", экономика Украины теряет под собой колеса, так сказать, а МВФ теперь признает, что она нуждаетя в очередных 15 млрд долларов сверх денег, уже выданных за прошедшие недели, чтобы избежать тотального обрушения. 

This has come after news the Ukrainian Central Bank’s foreign exchange reserves have fallen below $10 billion. 


Все это стало достоянием общественности после новостей о падении валютных резервов Украинского Центробанка за грань отметки в 10 млрд долларов. 


Ukraine must pay a further $1.6 billion from these reserves before year end to fulfil its part of the gas deal the EU brokered between Ukraine and Russia on 30th October 2014.

Украина должна выплатить очередные 1,6 млрд долларов из этих резервов до конца года, чтобы выполнить свои обязательства по газовой сделке между Россией и Украиной, заключенной при посредничестве ЕС 30 октября 2014 года. 


This will push the Central Bank’s foreign exchange reserves down to even more critical levels.
Это столкнет валютные резервы Центробанка дальше вниз на еще более критические уровни. 

Meanwhile Gazprom has said that despite Ukraine’s recent purchase of 1 billion cubic meters of gas from Russia, Ukraine’s total gas reserves are close to critical levels, endangering transit of Russian gas to Europe.

В это же время Газпром заявляет, что несмотря на недавнее приобретение Украиной 1 млрд кубометров газа из России,
общий объем украинских газовых запасов в хранилище приближается к критическому рубежу, подвергая опасности срыва транзит российского газа в Европу. 

The article however exposes something else, which is perhaps even more important.

Статья однако обнаруживает еще кое-что, что может быть гораздо важнее.

The last two paragraphs in the article show that the German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble has been obliged to telephone Anton Siluanov, Russia’s Finance Minister, to ask him not to call in Russia’s $3 billion loan, which becomes automatically repayable when Ukraine’s debt exceeds 60% of its GDP, something which everybody knows has now happened.

Последние два параграфа статьи указывают на то, что министр финансов Германии Вольфганг Шобле вынужден звонить Антону Силуанову, министру финансов России, и просить его не предъявлять к оплате украинский долг в 3 млрд долларов, который становится автоматически обязательным к выплате, как только долг Украины превысит 60% ВВП, что, как всем известно, только что произошло.

It also says that “George Osborne, the UK finance minister, expressed surprise at the request, attendees said, saying the EU was now asking for help from Russia at the same time it was sanctioning the Kremlin for its actions in Ukraine.”

Там также говорится и о том, что "министр финансов Соединенного Королевства Британии Джордж Осборн выразил удивление такой просьбой, по сообщениям присутствовавших, заявив, что теперь ЕС просит помощи у России и одновременно вводит санкции против Кремля за его действия на Украине."

In other words in order to “save” Ukraine (and their own political reputations) the European leadership is now being forced to turn to Russia for help - the same country they accuse of invading and destabilising Ukraine and which they have sanctioned.

Другими словами, для того, чтобы "спасти" Украину (и собственные политические репутации), европейское руководство теперь вынуждено обращаться к России за помощью - к той самой стране, которую они обвиняют во вторжении и дестабилизации Украины, к той самой стране, против которой они ввели санкции.

The background to this is that Russia is Ukraine’s biggest creditor with Ukraine owing Russia around $35 billion. Money the IMF gives to Ukraine therefore inevitably ends up in Russia by way of debt repayments.

Факты за всем этим таковы - Россия является крупнейшим кредитором Украины, которая должна России примерно 35 млрд долларов. Все деньги, предоставляемые МВФ Украине таким образом неизбежно оказываются в России в виде долговых платежей.

As we previously reported, another article in the Financial Times has confirmed what many have suspected - the western powers have been looking for excuses for Ukraine to renege on its debts to Russia whilst pretending it is not a default. To their intense frustration the western powers have discovered that the Russians were extremely careful to make their loans to Ukraine totally full-proof. The option of reneging on the loans does not therefore exist.

Как мы уже сообщали, еще одна статья в Файнэншиал Таймз подтвердила то, что многие подозревали - западные державы ищут повода для Украины пренебречь своими долгами России, одновременно притворяясь, что это вовсе не дефолт. К своему сильнейшему раздражению западные державы обнаружили, что русские были предельно осторожны, дабы сделать свои кредиты Украине полностью защищенными от подобного развития событий. Вследствие чего, вариант отказа от обязательств по выплатам кредитов в документах просто отсутствует.

Transfers of yet more money to Ukraine from the West are now becoming so large and so open-ended that the point is probably soon coming (if it has not already come) when more transfers including the $15 billion the IMF is talking about would have to be authorised by national parliaments before they could legally happen.

Переводы дополнительных средств Украине с Запада становятся такими крупными и ненадежными к возврату, что ситуация подходит (если уже  не подошла) к той точке, когда дальнейшие трансферы, включая 15 млрд долларов, о которых говорит МВФ, будут вынуждены обязательно проходить авторизацию национальными парламентами прежде, чем они смогут легально состояться. 


At a time of economic austerity that might be very difficult to pull off, especially once it got known that most or even all the money would ultimately end up in Russia. At the very least it might lead to Western governments being asked serious questions in their parliaments about the policy in Ukraine they have been following - questions the governments might not want to answer or to have asked.

При политике жесткой экономии провернуть все это может оказаться очень непросто, особенно, поскольку всем известно, что большая часть или вообще все эти финансовые средства целиком рано или поздно окажутся в России. Все это приведет по меньшей мере к тому, что западные правительства окажутся перед лицом очень серьезных вопросов в своих парламентах по поводу проводимой ими украинской политики - вопросов, на которые эти правительства вряд ли хотели бы отвечать и вряд ли хотели бы, чтобы они вообще были заданы. 


The result is that Western governments are turning to Russia for help since, as has been obvious from the start, it is only with Russia’s help that Ukraine can be stabilised politically and economically.

В результате, западные правительства вновь обращаются за помощью к России, так как, вполне очевидно, что только с помощью России Украина может быть стабилизирована политически и экономически.

At the same time, as Merkel’s most recent comments show, they don’t want to make any concessions to Russia over Ukraine or modify their policy there.
В то же время, согласно недавним комментариям Меркель, они не хотят идти ни на какие уступки России по Украине, так же, как и менять свою политику в этом вопросе.

This is the delusion the West’s Ukrainian policy has suffered from ever since talks about Ukraine’s association agreement with the EU first got started.
Это и есть основное заблуждение, которым страдает "Украинская политика" Запада, начиная с самых первых дней переговоров по ассоциации Украины в ЕС.

The West wants Ukraine to follow a pro-West pro-EU anti-Russia line. At the same time they want and expect Russia to pay the bills. They are then baffled and angry when Russia says no.

Запад хочет, чтобы Украина следовала прозападной проевросоюзной антироссийской линии. В то же время они хотят и ожидают, что Россия будет платить по всем счетам. А потом недоумевают и сердятся, когда Россия говорит "нет".


Though Russia goes on saying no, they refuse to take no for an answer. Instead they threaten and pass more sanctions and vilify and abuse Russia’s leadership in what is looking like an increasingly desperate hope that this will force Russia to back down and change its policy.

И хотя Россия продолжает говорить "нет", они отказываются принимать "нет" как ответ. Вместо этого они угрожают санкциями, вводят новые и прессуют и обливают грязью руководство России в своих, как это выглядит со стороны, все более безнадежных попытках заставить Россию отступить и изменить свою политику. 


When that doesn’t happen they are left looking like a card sharp with no cards left to play.

Когда этого не происходит, они остаются с носом, как записной картежник, у которого не осталось карт для игры.

The latest report from the IMF shows that the moment when this delusional policy finally comes crashing down to earth may not now be so far off.

Последний отчет МВФ показывает, что момент, когда эта политика заблуждений наконец обрушится, уже теперь не за горами.

The International Monetary Fund has identified a $15bn shortfall in its bailout for war-torn Ukraine and warned western governments the gap will need to be filled within weeks to avoid financial collapse.

Международный Валютный Фонд уже определил недостачу в 15 млрд долларов в своих попытках спасти Украину и предупредил западные правительства о том, что эта "дыра" должна быть заделана в  ближайшие недели во избежание финансового коллапса.

The IMF’s calculations lay bare the perilous state of Ukraine’s economy and hint at the financial burden of propping up Kiev as it battles Russian-backed separatist rebels in its eastern regions.

Расчеты МВФ четко описывают смертельно опасное состояние украинской экономики и намекают на финансовую тяжесть поддержки Киева в то время, как он сражается в восточном регионе с сепаратистами-повстанцами, которых поддерживает Россия.

The additional cash needed would come on top of the $17bn IMF rescue announced in April and due to last until 2016. Senior western officials involved in the talks said there is only tepid support for such a sizeable increase at a time Kiev has dragged its feet over the economic and administrative reforms required by the programme.


Необходимые дополнительные наличные средства пойдут сверх тех 17 млрд долларов программы "спасения", объявленной МВФ к реализации с апреля до конца 2016 года. Западные чиновники высшего ранга, задействованные в переговорах, заявили, что поддержка такого масштабного увеличения помощи была очень вялой  в то время, как Киев "еле тащится" с реализацией экономических и административных реформ, предусмотренных программой.

“It’s not going to be easy,” said one official involved in the talks. “There’s not that much money out there.”

"Это будет совсем непросто", сказал один официальный представитель, участвующий в обсуждениях. "Таких больших денег там просто нет".


People briefed on the IMF warning said the fiscal gap has opened up because of a 7 per cent contraction in Ukraine’s gross domestic product and a collapse in exports to Russia, the country’s biggest trading partner, leading to massive capital outflows and a rundown in central bank reserves.

Люди, которых мы спрашивали о предупреждениях МВФ, заявляли, что фискальная недостача открылась из-за 7%-го уменьшения украинского ВВП и обрушения экспорта в Россию, крупнейшего торгового партнера страны, что привело к массивному уходу капиталов и плохому состоянию резервов центробанка.

The breakaway regions of the east accounted for nearly 16 per cent of Ukraine’s economic output before the start of hostilities.

Отколовшие регионы востока отвечали за 16% промышленного производства в украинской экономике до начала конфронтаций.

Without additional aid, Kiev would have to massively slash its budget or be forced to default on its sovereign debt obligations. Since the bailout programme began in April, Ukraine has received $8.2bn in funding from the IMF and other international creditors.

Без дополнительной помощи Киеву придется массивно урезать свой бюджет или быть принудительно подвергнутым дефолту по суверенным долговым обязательствам. С того момента, когда началась в апреле программа финансовой поддержки, Украина уже получила 8,2 млрд долларов от МВФ и других международных кредиторов. 


Pierre Moscovici, the EU economics chief, said the European Commission was weighing a third rescue programme on top of the €1.6bn ($2bn) it has already committed to Kiev; the Ukrainian government has requested an additional €2bn from Brussels.

Пьер Московичи, один из экономических руководителей ЕС заявил, что Европейская комиссия рассматривала третий пакет программы спасения размером в 1,6 млрд евро в дополнение к тем средствам, которые были уже выделены Киеву; украинское правительство запросило у Брюсселя еще 2 млрд евро.


But Pier Carlo Padoan, the Italian finance minister who chaired a discussion of Ukraine’s financial situation at a meeting of his EU counterparts on Tuesday, said EU resources should only be mobilised if Kiev made a “stronger effort” towards implementing reforms.

Но Пьер Карло Падоан, премьер министр Италии, возглавлявший переговоры по финансовой ситуации на Украине, на встрече со своими коллегами по ЕС во вторник, по сведениям источников из ЕС, сказал о том, что ресурсы ЕС должны быть мобилизованы только в том случае, если Киев приложит больше усилий в проведении реформ.

At a meeting of his cabinet in Kiev, Ukraine’s prime minister, Arseniy Yatseniuk, insisted his government was prepared to put in place unpopular measures, including deep cuts in spending, a crackdown on the massive shadow economy and moves to deregulate the country’s uncompetitive economy.

На совещании своего кабинета министров в Киеве, премьер-министр Украины Арсений Яценюк настаивал на том, что его правительство готово принять непопулярные меры, включающие серьезное урезание расходов,  меры по борьбе с теневой экономикой и действия по дерегуляции неконкурентоспособной экономики страны.


“It’s hard for us to make ends meet ourselves,” Mr Yatseniuk said. “We are not begging for money, we are not moaning. We are saying: we are partners. If we are partners, then help us and this help will go both ways.”

"Для нас трудно свести концы с концами самим", сказал господин Яценюк. "Мы не клянчим денег, мы не стенаем. Мы говорим: мы партнеры. Если мы партнеры, тогда помогите нам и эта помощь будет выгодной для обеих сторон."

Under IMF rules, the fund cannot distribute aid unless it has certainty a donor country can meet its financing obligations for the next 12 months, meaning the fund is unlikely to be able to send any additional cash to Kiev until the $15bn gap is closed.
По правилам ВМФ фонд не может распределять помощь до тех пор, пока не будет уверен, что страна получатель помощи сможет выполнить свои финансовые обязательства на 12 месяцев вперед, что означает, что фонд вряд ли будет в состоянии послать Киеву какую-либо дополнительную наличность до тех пор, пока прореха в 15 млрд долларов не будет закрыта.

The scale of the problem became clearer last week after Ukraine’s central bank revealed its foreign currency reserves had dropped from $16.3bn in May to just $9bn in November. The data also showed the value of its gold reserves had dropped by nearly half over the same period.

Масштаб проблемы стал понятен на прошлой неделе после того, как Центробанк Украины раскрыл сокращение своих валютных резервов с 16 млрд долларов в мае до всего 9 млрд долларов в ноябре. Эти сведения показали также, что стоимость ее золотых запасов сократилась наполовину за тот же период.

A person with direct knowledge of the central bank’s policy said part of the drop had been due to large-scale gold sales.

Источник, обладающий прямыми данными о политике центробанка, заявил, что снижение стоимости золотого запаса произошло благодаря масштабным распродажам золота.

An IMF mission is currently in Kiev for talks with the government on the future of the programme.
Миссия МВФ в настоящее время находится в Киеве для проведения переговоров с правительством по будущему этой программы.

According to two people who attended the EU meeting, concern over Ukrainian finances has become so severe that Wolfgang Schäuble, the German finance minister, said he had called his Russian counterpart, Anton Siluanov, to ask him to roll over a $3bn loan the Kremlin made to Kiev last year.

По информации двух источников, присутствовавших на совещании ЕС, беспокойство по поводу украинских финансов стало настолько серьезным, что Вольфгангу Шобле, министру финансов Германии, пришлось позвонить своему коллеге из России Антону Силуанову, чтобы попросить его свернуть на время требование по выплатам 3 миллиардного долларового кредита Кремля, который был предоставлен Киеву в прошлом году (2013).

George Osborne, the UK finance minister, expressed surprise at the request, attendees said, saying the EU was now asking for help from Russia at the same time it was sanctioning the Kremlin for its actions in Ukraine.

Джордж Осборн, министр финансов Британии, по этому поводу выразил свое удивление этой просьбой о помощи от России в то самое время, когда против Кремля осуществляются санкции за действия на Украине.

sunnuntai 6. tammikuuta 2019

Ukraine's Neo-Nazis Are the Most Dangerous in Europe



Ukraine's Neo-Nazis Are the Most Dangerous in Europe





The West's tolerance of Ukraine's right-wing, neo-Nazi paramilitary groups is disgusting, but hardly surprising. And now they pose a serious danger to Ukraine and the rest of Europe.

Damir Marinovich OPINION Mon, Mar 16 2015


"European values"

Many were shocked when Kiev openly admitted that neo-Nazis are part of the Ukrainian armed forces, that they are controlled by Kiev and that without them "the Russian army" could not be stopped. Most of the Western media have completely ignored this scandalous statement.

According to Western politicians and media there is no real danger of Ukrainian nationalistic extremists taking over power or influencing politics in Ukraine. On the contrary, influential US neo-cons including professional Russophobe Anne Applebaum argues that the West must support Ukrainian nationalism: "Nationalism is exactly what Ukraine needs now."

Influential militant groups like Right Sector and Azov battalion advocate ethnic segregation, aggressive Ukrainaization, total subordination of everything to the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism, and the purge of anything non-Ukrainian.Their goal is to assimilate or exterminate all national and cultural minorities and establish unitary national state with a strong authoritarian leader.


Coincidence?

However, maybe radical Ukrainism is just a form of extreme nationalism that exists in every country or there is something more to it? What makes it different in comparison with nationalism/fascism in other countries?

These are four important reasons why Ukrainian neo-Nazis are much more dangerous than their European comrades:

1. Driven by clear political agenda, Western media are minimizing the role of Ukrainian neo-Nazis in Ukrainian society/politics. Yes, in Russia and the rest of the Europe, there are neo-Nazi and nationalistic groups but there is no country in the world where declared neo-Nazis control security services, hold important position in Ministry of Interior and in Parliament and so on. In other countries, neo-Nazis are just marginal political groups with no significant influence on the country's political life.

2. Western governments support and encourage Ukrainian nationalism/fascism. Western governments are not only ignoring and underestimating the power of the Ukrainian radical right, but they are directly encouraging and strengthening it, having in mind a long therm geo-political plan of establishing Ukraine as"Anti-Russia", as excellently explained by Nikolai Starikov.


Ukrainian neo-Nazi Parubiy and NATO Deputy Secretary-General Vershbow - match made in heaven?

That's the reason the Pentagon is providing training for Ukrainian volunteer battalions and considering arming them with lethal weapons. For example, have a look at the case of the detained Right Sector nationalist Savchenko, accused of torturing and killing civilians and journalists. Not only did she become a member of the Ukrainian Rada while in detention, but she was also recently approved as a member of Ukraine's delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) by votes of European parliamentarians who are also supporting ludicrous Free Savchenko campaign.

Poroshenko awarded Ukrainian citizenship to Belorussian Serhiy Korotkykh, a founding member of the neo-Nazi National Socialist Society (NSS)

3. Infiltration of neo-Nazis in Ukrainian institutions (parliament, government, military, police etc.). Many Western apologists of the Maidan coup d'état will mention the fact that the most prominent far-right organization Right Sector didn't pass the election threshold of 5% during Ukrainian parliamentary elections. However they will forget to mention that both Interpol wanted Dmytro Yarosh and Borislav Bereza were elected as MPs thanks to mixed electoral system (both proportional and majoritarian) which allows direct election of MPs in their electoral districts.

Extreme right-wing populist Lyahsko, leader of the Radical Party, is also a member of ruling pro-NATO coalition. Even highly influential and anti-Russian US foreign policy journal: Foreign Policy wrote about his radical right, thuggish and scandalous behavior, including public torture of POWs. White power supremacist and Azov battalion leader Andriy Biletsky is part of Yatsenyuk's People's Front party that won the parliamentary elections. Currently he is an MP in the Ukrainian Rada and member of the ruling coalition.He is well-known for openly promoting his racist "white power" and Nazi views. Andriy Parubiy, co-founder of the Neo-Nazi Social-National Party of Ukraine, was appointed as a Secretary of the National Security and National Defense Committee. Together with current Prime Minister Yatsenyuk he founded the new People's Front party. Currently he is a MP and deputy speaker of the Ukrainian parliament.


Ukrainian Nazis posing at the Kiev police headquarters since their Nazi comrade became Kiev police chief

Neo-nazi Azov battalion officially became a special military unit of Ukrainian interior ministry and it is under its control. So formerly neo-Nazi militants are part of the Ministry of Police. Furthermore, Vadim Troyan, deputy commander of Azov battalionhas been appointed as the head of the Kiev police. Poroshenko even decorated him for valor.

Even though, one can notice marginal presence of far-right parties in some of EU member states parliaments, no far right or neo-Nazi groups are part of a government, not to speak about being part of army and police forces.

4. Open state support to Ukrainian fascism Ukrainian nationalistic ideology is already deeply entrenched in the Ukrainian education system and openly promoted by Ukrainian mainstream media. For example, Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera, accused for atrocities against Jews, Poles and Russians, is considered by many, especially youth and even "moderate" Poroshenko, as a positive historical figure, a national hero and founding father of the modern Ukrainian state.








Ukraine's Stamp commemorating 100 years of birth of Ukraine Nazi Collaborator and genocidal killer Stepan Bandera

In terms of ideology one can argue that Ukrainian nationalism is more Nazi-like because of Bandera's collaboration with Nazis, the Ukrainian SS division adored by many in western and central Ukraine, and Azov battalion's current popularity and strength. One could also argue that there is a difference between Right Sector fascist ideology and Azov neo-Nazi "white power" ideology, but they are both strong representative of radical Ukrainism and their goal is the same.

There are numerous reports about war crimes of nationalist volunteer battalions. It's obvious that these Ukrainian marauders are not afraid of the potential consequences and criminal proceedings against them for committing war crimes, since they are an integral part of the power structure in Kiev. This can explain why they openly brag about war crimes, recruit foreign Nazis for Azov and war tourism, admit to torture in - squeezing nipples with pliers, putting needles under fingernails, waterboarding, racketeering androbing companies and individuals allegedly for "patriotic cause" and branding Swastikas on prisoners’ buttocks.












HOW THE WEST EATS ITS CHILDREN (T. MEYSSAN)




How the West eats its children


For Thierry Meyssan, by taking to the streets, the French have become the first Western population to take personal risks to oppose financial globalisation. Although they do not realise it, and still imagine that their problems are exclusively national, their enemy is the same force that crushed the region of the African Great Lakes and a part of the Greater Middle East. In order to understand the project which inextricably unites these apparently disparate events, we have to take a step back.

 | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) 
 
JPEG - 55.6 kb

The cause of Western recession

International relations experienced a profound change with the paralysis of the Soviet Union in 1986, when the State was unable to control the civilian nuclear incident in Tchernobyl [1], then with the revocation of the Warsaw Pact in 1989, when the East German Communist Party [2] destroyed the Berlin Wall, and finally, with the dissolution of the USSR in 1991.

At that time, the President of the United States, George Bush Sr., decided to demobilise one million soldiers and devote the efforts of his country to its own prosperity. He wanted to transform US hegemony within its zone of influence, and expand it into that of the leader of the world, the guarantor of world stability. With that, he laid the foundations for a « New World Order », first of all in the speech he gave side by side with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, at the Aspen Institute (2 August 1990), then during his speech to Congress (11 September 1990), announcing operation « Desert Storm » [3].

The world of the après-Soviet Union is one of free circulation, not only of merchandise, but also world capital, under the unique control of the United States. In other words, the passage from capitalism to financialisation – not the triumphant culmination of free exchange, but an exacerbated form of colonial exploitation of the whole world, including the West. Within the space of a quarter of a century, the major US fortunes have multiplied many times, and the global wealth of the world has increased considerably.

By allowing capitalism to run wild, President Bush Sr. hoped to extend prosperity to the world. But capitalism is not a political project, it is simply a system of logic designed for creating profit. The logic of the US multinationals was to increase their profits by delocalising production to China, where it is now possible, and where workers are the lowest paid in the world.

Those who were prepared to measure the cost of this advance for the West were few and far between. New middle classes began to appear in the third world, and although they were, of course, far less wealthy than those in the West, they enabled new, mainly Asian states, to play a rôle on the world stage. But simultaneously, Western middle classes began to disappear [4], meaning that it became impossible for the democratic institutions they built to survive. Above all, the populations of entire regions were to be entirely crushed, starting with those of the African Great Lakes. This first regional war caused 6 million deaths, in Angola, Burundi, Namibia, Uganda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Zimbabwe, and was met with general incomprehension and indifference. The aim was to continue to seize the natural resources of these countries, but to pay less and less for them, which meant dealing with gangs rather than with the States who had to feed their populations.

The sociological transformation of the world is happening very fast and is clearly without precedent, although we do not have the statistical tools available today to evaluate it with precision. However, everyone can witness the increase in power of Eurasia, (not in the Gaullist sense of « Brest to Vladivostok », but that of Russia and Asia without Western and Central Europe), which seeks liberty and prosperity, while the Western powers, including the United States, are slowly and progressively declining, limiting individual freedom and ejecting half of their population into zones of poverty.

Today, the percentage of imprisonment in China is four times inferior to that of the United States,while their purchasing power is slightly higher. Objectively therefore, with all its faults, Chine has become a freer and more prosperous country than the United States.

This process was predictable from the beginning. Its application was studied for a long time. So, on 1 September 1987, a US forty-year-old published a page of counter-current publicity in the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Boston Globe. He warned his compatriots about the rôle that President Bush Sr. was planning to allocate to the United States – to assume and finance out of their own pockets the responsibility for the developing « New World Order ». People read it and laughed. The author of these texts was real estate promoter, Donald Trump.
The application of the economic model to international relations

One month after the attacks of 11 September 2001, US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld nominated his friend Admiral Arthur Cebrowski as Director of the new Office of Force Transformation. He was tasked with changing the culture of the entire US military in order to enable it to respond to a complete change in its mission

There was no longer question of using US armies to defend principles or interests, but to use them for a reorganisation of the world by dividing it into two parts – one one side the states integrated into the globalised economy, and on the other, the others [5]. The Pentagon would no longer fight wars in order to steal natural resources, but to control access to those resources by the globalised nations. A division directly inspired by the process of globalisation which had already trashed half of the Western populations. This time, it was half of the world’s population which was to be excluded [6].

The reorganisation of the world began in the political zone known as the « Greater Middle East », that is to say stretching from Afghanistan to Morocco, with the exception of Israël, Lebanon and Jordan. This brought about the alleged epidemic of civil wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Syria and Yemen, which has already caused several million deaths.

Like a monster eating its own children, the global financial system based in the United States faced its first crisis in 2008, when the subprime bubble burst. Contrary to a commonly-held belief, this was absolutely not a global crisis, but a Western problem. For the first time, the NATO states experienced the first consequences of the policy they were supporting. Yet the upper Western classes changed nothing in their behaviour, as they witnessed with compassion the wreck of the middle classes. The only notable modification was the adoption of the « Volcker rule » [7], which forbade banks from profiting from information obtained from their clients in order to speculate against their interests. But while conflicts of interest enabled a number of crooks to get rich fast, they are not the root of the problem, which is far more wide-reaching.
The revolt of the Western populations

The revolt of the Western middle and working classes against the globalised upper class began two years ago.

Aware of the Western recession as compared with Asia, the people of the United Kingdom were the first to attempt to save its life-style by leaving the European Union and turning to China and the Commonwealth (referendum of 23 June 2016) [8]. Unfortunately, the leaders of the United Kingdom were unable to conclude the agreement they hoped for with China and experienced great difficulty in reactivating their links with the Commonwealth.

Then, witnessing the collapse of their civil industries, a part of the United States voted, on 8 November 2016, for the only Presidential candidate who was opposed to the New World Order, Donald Trump. He spoke of a return to the « American dream ». Unfortunately for his voters, although Donald Trump began to question the rules of globalised commerce, he had no team with him apart from his family, and was only able to modify, but not change, the military strategy of his country. Almost all of the general officers had adopted the Rumsfeld-Cebrowski ideology, and could no longer imagine themselves in any other role than defenders of financial globalisation.

Aware of the collapse of their national industry, and certain that they would be betrayed by their upper class, the Italians voted, on 4 March 2018, for an anti-system party composed of the Ligue and the 5-star Movement. These parties built an alliance in order to implement social policies. Unfortunately, they were rejected by the European Union [9]. In France, tens of thousands of SME’s (small and medium-sized enterprises), subcontractors of industry, had gone bankrupt over the last ten years, but their compulsory tax deductions, already among the highest in the world, increased by 30 % over the same period.

Several hundreds of thousands of French people suddenly took to the streets to demonstrate against abusive financial measures. Unfortunately for them, the French upper classes have been contaminated by the very idea that was rejected by the United States, and therefore did their best to adapt their policies to the popular revolt, but not to change its basic causes.

If we look at each of these four countries separately, we will find four different explanations for what is happening there. But if we analyse the situation as a single phenomenon affecting different cultures, we will discover the same mechanisms across the board. In these four countries, consecutive with the end of capitalism, the middle classes disappeared more or less rapidly, and with them the political system that they incarnated - Democracy.

So either the Western leaders abandon the financial system they have developed and return to the productive capitalism of the Cold War, or they will have to invent a different organisation that no-one has so far been able imagine. Failing that, the West, which has directed the world for five centuries, will sink into a long period of internal chaos.

The Syrians were the first non-globalised People capable of surviving and resisting the destruction of Rumsfeld-Cebrowski’s infra-world. The French were the first globalised people to rise up against the destruction of the West, even if they are not aware that they are fighting the same unique enemy of all of humanity. President Emmanuel Macron is not the man for the situation, not because he has any responsibility for the system that preceded him, but because he is pure product of that system. In response to the riots in his country, he spoke from the G20 in Buenos-Aires, declaring that the meeting was a success in his eyes, (which it was not), and that he intended to advance more efficiently than his predecessors - in the wrong direction.
How to save privilege

It appears that the British ruling class has its solution - if London in particular and the Western nations in general are no longer capable of ruling the world, it will be necessary to cut one’s losses and divide the world into two distinct zones. This is the policy implemented by Obama in the final months of his presidency [10], then by Theresa May, and now by Donald Trump, with their refusal to cooperate and their ready-made accusations, first of all against Russia and now against China.

It also seems that Russia and China, despite their historical rivalry, are aware that they will never be able to ally themselves with these Westerners who have never ceased trying to carve them up. This is the source of their project, the « Eurasian Economic Union » - if the world must be split in two, each participant will have to organise its own. In concrete terms, for Beijing, this means abandoning half of its « Silk Road » project and its redeployment with Moscow only in Greater Eurasia.
How to determine the line of demarcation

For the West and Greater Eurasia, it will be necessary to determine the split line as fast as possible. For example, what side will Ukraine choose? The construction by Russia of the Kertch bridge was aimed at separating the country, absorbing the Donbass and the Azov Sea basin, then Odessa and Transnistria. On the contrary, the incident at Kertch, organised by the Western powers, is aimed at enrolling all of Ukraine into NATO before the country fractures.

Since the ship of financial globalisation is sinking, many people are beginning to save their personal interests without any care for others. For example this is the source of the tension between the European Union and the United States. As far as this game is concerned, the Zionist movement has always had a length’s lead, which explains the mutation of Israëli strategy, which has abandoned Syria to Russia, and turned to both the Gulf States and East Africa.
Perspectives

Taking into account what is at play here, it is obvious that the insurrection in France is only the beginning of a much wider process which is going to spread to other Western countries.

It would be absurd to believe that at a time of financial globalisation, a government, whatever it might be, could resolve the problems of its country without first of all questioning international relations and at the same time regaining its capacity for action. But precisely, foreign policy has been kept on the sidelines of the democratic field since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. It is both necessary and urgent to resign from almost all of the treaties and engagements of the last thirty years. Only the states which are able to re-affirm their sovereignty can hope to recover.
Thierry Meyssan

Translation
Pete Kimberley





[1] According to Michaïl Gorbatchev, this was the event that made possible the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union in so far as it delegitimised the State.

[2] Contrary to a commonly-held belief in the West, it was the nationalists from the East-German Communist Party (and the Lutheran churches), and not the anti-Communists (and pro-US movements), who broke down the symbol of Soviet domination, the Wall.

[3] The main purpose of the invasion of Iraq was not to liberate Kuwaït, but to use this affair to build the strongest coalition possible under US command, including the USSR.

[4] Global Inequality. A New Approach for the Age of Globalization, Branko Milanovic, Harvard University Press, 2016.

[5] “The US military project for the world”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 22 August 2017.

[6] It is obvious that the wars of Bush Jr. and Obama were never intended to expand the Empire. First of all because by definition, democracy can only come from the People, not imposed by bombs. And then because the United States was already a plutocracy.

[7] The ex-president of the US Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker, is on the other hand, one of the architects of global financialisation. It is Volcker who took legal action on behalf of the UNO against the people and entities who had helped Iraq to bypass the UN embargo (the « oil for food » affair). Volcker is one of the principal personalities of the Pilgrim’s Society, the trans-Atlantic club presided by Queen Elizabeth II. As such, he became the main economic advisor to President Barack Obama, and organised part of his cabinet.

[8] “The new British Foreign Policy”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 4 July 2016.

[9] Replacing the European Common Market, which was originally a system for cooperation between states, the European Union, as defined by the Treaty of Maastricht, is a supranational

[10] “Two separate worlds”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Pete Kimberley, Al-Watan (Syria) , Voltaire Network, 8 November 2016.